1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

purport, purport, and.

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[The grounds alleged in the trial in the appeal by the plaintiff are not significantly different from the contents alleged in the first instance court, and even when considering Gap evidence Nos. 30 through Gap evidence Nos. 43-4 which are additionally submitted in the above argument and the first instance court, it is difficult to view that the plaintiffs, who entered Korea due to the pertinent religious-related activities which are subject to punishment in the country of nationality, have a well-founded fear of persecution from the government of the country of nationality when they return to the country of nationality, or a person who has a well-founded fear of persecution from the country of nationality when they return to the country of nationality when they return to the country of nationality, or who return to the country of nationality to the country of nationality due to active and leading activities related to the relevant religion in Korea (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Du14378, Apr. 25, 2013). Accordingly, it is reasonable that such plaintiffs' claims for fact finding and the judgment of the court of first instance are not acceptable, and thus, all different from the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.