1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is based on Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

(2) In light of the purport of the Supreme Court Decision 201Du14378 Decided April 28, 2013, the judgment of the first instance court and the first instance court is justified in rejecting the plaintiffs' claims based on the premise that, in light of the purport of the Supreme Court Decision 201Du14378 Decided April 28, 2013, the plaintiffs' claims for refugee status cannot be dismissed, since it is justified in its conclusion that, in order for the plaintiff to be recognized as refugee status, the activities of religious organizations are persons with sufficient fear that they would be detrimental to the country of nationality if they return to the country of nationality after being arrested or detained due to the pertinent religious-related activities which are subject to punishment within the country of nationality, or those with sufficient fear that the government of the country of nationality would be likely to be detrimental to the country of nationality if they return to the country of nationality due to active and leading activities related to the religion in Korea."