1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is based on Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

(1) In light of the purport of the Supreme Court Decision 201Du14378 Decided April 28, 2013, the Plaintiffs’ assertion that “The grounds alleged in the trial at the trial at the trial at the time of appeal are not significantly different from the contents as alleged in the first instance court.” Considering that the Plaintiffs’ assertion and the facts stated in the Evidence Nos. 22 through 27 additionally submitted in the above argument and the trial at the trial, the Plaintiffs’ assertion that “a person who, as a religious organization activity, enters Korea upon being arrested or detained in the pertinent religious-related activities which are subject to punishment in the country of nationality, enters Korea for the purpose of becoming a refugee, has sufficient fear of harming the government of the country of nationality if they return to the country of nationality, or who, as a result, actively and leading activities related to the pertinent religion in Korea, return to the country of nationality, constitutes a person with sufficient fear of harming the government of the country of nationality if they return to the country of nationality, the Plaintiffs’ assertion that the Plaintiffs’ request for fact-finding and the first instance decision are dismissed is without merit.