The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (definite or misunderstanding of legal principles) is consistent from the investigative agency to the court of the court below. The victim made a statement at a relatively consistent from the investigative agency to the court of the court below that “the defendant sustained bodily injury by treating two parts of elbows in front of the floor and treating his head.” After the occurrence of the instant case, the hospital was hospitalized and treated for seven days, and the victim took out the testimony at the court of the court of the court below, and there is no reason to make a false statement in the situation where the victim expressed his intention not to punish the defendant.” While the witness F made a statement at the court of the court of the court below, it is difficult for the victim to believe that the above statement was done on the part of the defendant, and the on-site sending police officer stated in E in the court of the court below that “the victim was finite with her head and intentionally faced with her own floor,” and the head part of the diagnosis statement was sufficient to see whether the victim was damaged by the victim’s act, but the victim’s testimony and ek.”

2. Determination

A. According to witness E and F’s testimony, etc., the court below acknowledged the fact that the victim was deadly living in the office of the management office of the building of this case where the victim was dead, but stated that the witness E and F did not see the price of the victim’s blue with his arms.