The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case on the ground that the defendant was guilty of misunderstanding the facts, although he could be found to have carried the victim's body with balp and balp with balp saw, he was guilty of the charge in this case.

2. The summary of the facts charged was around 13:20 on August 22, 2014, on the grounds that the Defendant, at the front side of Seoul Yongsan C, was in sight of the Victim D, and was influenced by the Victim D, and the Defendant was influencing the Victim’s arms with blaps and head flaps, and the Defendant was influencing the Victim by cutting down the Victim’s arms.

3. Determination

A. The lower court determined as follows, based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court: (a) the Defendant consistently stated that: (b) the Defendant: (a) from the investigative agency to the lower court to the lower court’s original court stated that: (a) the Defendant was in the process of removing the head debt by removing the head debt; (c) only attached D’s arms or was sealed; and (d) immediately reported to the police after having committed assault from D; and (d) was also stated at the court of the lower court that “D was generated in the process of putting the Defendant’s own arms; (b) the Defendant only stated the fact that the head was flicked from the Defendant at the time of the first statement at the investigative agency; and (c) did not consistently state that the head was removed from the investigation agency at the time of the first statement; and (d) the process and effect that the Defendant’s head was not sold to the lower court to the effect that the Defendant’s head was not sold to the lower court.