logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.08.19 2019고정307
전기공사업법위반
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be 2,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although a person who intends to operate electrical construction business is registered with the Special Metropolitan City Mayor, the Metropolitan City Mayor, the Do Governor, or the Special Self-Governing Province Governor having jurisdiction over the location of the principal place of business, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the defendant, from May 28, 2016 to June 2, 2016, without registering the electrical construction business at the site of construction of the building building B in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju, received KRW 5 million at the request of the owner of the building, who is the owner of the building, and operated electrical construction business during the construction

Summary of Evidence

Part of Defendant’s Court Statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the accused at each court hearing of the witness C and D;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigation report (Submission by the complainant of the detailed list of transactions of automated machines);

1. Details of transactions for entry and withdrawal;

1. A report on the determination of construction price under 2018 Ghana 44359;

1. Response to requests for investigation cooperation (whether to register electrical construction business, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the contents of the interrogation protocol before revision;

1. Article 42 (1) and Articles 42 (1) and 4 (1) of the former Electrical Construction Business Act (Amended by Act No. 16363, Apr. 23, 2019);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the defendant's assertion of the judgment on this issue are outside directors of the E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "E") who registered electrical construction business with the competent authority, and the construction of this case was executed after receiving daily wages from E under the direction and supervision of E under the name of E. The construction of this case is executed by the competent authority. The construction of this case is limited to E which registered electrical construction business with the competent authority, and it is not the defendant who did not register electrical construction business with the competent authority.

2. The evidence as seen earlier is examined.

arrow