Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the front way of “D E” located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, on May 16, 2016; and (b) on the front day of “D E” in which E, upon receiving a report from a person who takes alcohol, was sent to the Defendant, is provoking to make it difficult for E, to take the Defendant’s house into account; and (c) the police officer’s fright of bitch, fright

Chewing flachising flachising flachising flachising flachising flachising flachising flachising flachising flachising flachising the left left part of the police flachising flachising.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted police officers who perform 112 reporting dispatch duties and crime prevention duties, and at the same time, affected the effectiveness of repair cost equivalent to 20,000 won by tearing the victim E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol against E;

1. To work for the F District, each description of the processing table of reported cases, and the investigation report (attached estimates);

1. Application of image Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged parts of photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are favorable to the defendant, include: (a) assault against the police officer and damage to property; (b) however, it appears that the extent of the assault committed by the defendant or the extent of damage to property is minor; (c) the defendant does not have been punished by the obstruction of the performance of official duties and there is no penalty heavier than the fine; and (d) the economic situation appears to be good; and (e) the punishment is determined as ordered by taking into account all the sentencing conditions favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant’s age, sexual behavior, and circumstances after the crime, etc.