logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.02.18 2015고단5661
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On December 20, 2015, at around 23:45, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, on the roads near Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and upon receiving a report from 112, the Defendant was asked about the personal information of the Defendant from the slope E belonging to the Seoul Police Station Down-gu Seoul Police Station, which called out after receiving the notification that the Defendant would damage, such as destroying and damaging the ccema set up near the apartment. The Defendant was asked about the Defendant’s personal information from the slope E belonging to the Seoul Police Station Down-gu, Seoul, Gangnam-gu Police Station. The Defendant asked the name inside the Ge-Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga

This Chewing fix, while performing the desire of “E”, assaulted E’s private part of E’s private part of E by hand, etc. at one time, and assaulted by drinking at one time the right part of E’s drinking.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the dispatch of report 112.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around December 20, 2015; (b) around December 23:5, 2015; (c) around three police officers, including G while working at the D District located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F; and (d) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant is an attorney-at-law in the country of being drunk.

The head of Man-ro shall be discarded from the branch road.

Chewing grings, mashing h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.s.

The phrase “ Domination,” etc. Meeted 50 minutes, and satisfing 50 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (related to video images taken by a portable phone operator);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (Interference with the performance of official duties);

(1) The Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.

. Selection of fines

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant’s social status, and the Defendant’s power, etc., there is no room for further criticism against the instant crime.

arrow