logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.21 2017고단5117
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 06:00 on November 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 from a taxi engineer E, who did not pay a taxi fee; and (b) received a request from G police officer to return home to the taxi engineer, the Defendant expressed the above F to the effect that he was shouldered by the c.i.e., e., f., f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 report handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F, G, and H;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and the background of the instant crime and the attitude of the relevant act, etc., the Defendant has the record of being sentenced to a fine one time of suspended execution due to the same crime as the instant case, etc. on September 2013, 202, one time of a fine of around 2007, one time of a fine of around 2007, and one time of a fine of negligence of around 2015, and one time of a fine of negligence of around 2015, on the other hand, the Defendant is deemed to have led to a confession and reflect of the instant crime, and the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime by contingency under the influence of alcohol at the time, taking into account all the circumstances and sentencing guidelines shown in the records and changes theory

arrow