A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 4, 2017, the Defendant was under influence of alcohol in front of Asan-si B apartment house 102, 3, and 4 Ra, on the street, on the ground that “Amsan-si, a male under the influence of alcohol is under the influence of alcohol” on the ground that the Defendant, upon receiving a report from 112, was aware of the fact that the police officer D, who called to the site, was under the influence of alcohol on the street, was under the influence of alcohol.

The spits or spits, etc., which are public officials of the police, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports on the D 112 Report by means of assault, such as spits or spits, etc., after being spits or spits on the face at once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and photographs damaged by police officers;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Although the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is inferior to the nature of the crime, such as assaulting a police officer who performs legitimate duties under the influence of liquor on the grounds of sentencing, it is against the defendant's wrong recognition, the primary offender is the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as per the disposition shall be determined by taking into account the following factors: