A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) forged a lease agreement under the name of D as if he leased the above restaurant from D with a deposit of KRW 50 million using the name of the Defendant’s living D by using the name of the Defendant’s living D; (b) used the lease agreement under the name of D; and (c) used it to obtain money from one victim capital Co., Ltd. to obtain collateral loans.

1. On April 16, 2013, the Defendant forged a copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of Daejeon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu B2, Daejeon Metropolitan City, Mancheon-gu, Mancheon-gu, 500,000, Mancheon-gu, 500, Mancheon-gu, 100,000, Mancheon-gu, 100,000, Mancheon-gu, 100,000, Mancheon-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City, U.S., Ma-gu, 103, 602 in the lessor’s address column, stating “F” in the resident registration number column, “G”, and “D” in the name column, which are private documents related to rights and obligations.

2. In the event of the foregoing investigation document, the Defendant filed an application for a loan against security of commercial real estate deposit with the Han Bank located in the Shin-gu Daejeon-gu New Carbon and Vibration around the day specified in the above paragraph (1), and filed an application for the loan against security of commercial real estate deposit with an employee who has knowledge of the forgery, and exercised it as if he had been duly formed.

3. The Defendant submitted a forged real estate lease agreement at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as above, and applied for a loan to the effect that, on the 26th day of the same month, the Defendant transferred the claim to return the above lease deposit amounting to KRW 50 million to the victim capital Co., Ltd. as if he/she were the obligee to return the lease deposit amounting to KRW 50 million, and, on the 26th day of the same month, the Defendant applied for a loan to the effect that “the lending of money

However, in fact, the real estate lease contract was forged as mentioned in the above Paragraph 1, and the defendant has the above obligation to return the deposit.