logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2010. 01. 28. 선고 2009두18127 판결
채무자의 도산 등으로 이자소득이 실현되지 않았다는 주장의 당부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2009Nu4380 (Law No. 23, 2009)

Case Number of the previous trial

Suwon District Court 2007Guhap11307 ( October 14, 2009)

Title

Appropriateness of the assertion that interest income has not been realized due to the debtor's bankruptcy, etc.

Summary

The Income Tax Act adopts the principle of confirmation of rights and obligations, but it is impossible to impose income tax if it becomes impossible to recover due to the debtor's bankruptcy, etc. even if a claim that is the cause of income accrues.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow