logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2009. 09. 23. 선고 2009누4380 판결
채무자의 도산 등으로 이자소득이 실현되지 않았다는 주장의 당부[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court 2007Guhap11307 ( October 14, 2009)

Case Number of the previous trial

National High Court Decision 2007J 2618 (Law No. 279, 2007)

Title

Appropriateness of the assertion that interest income has not been realized due to the debtor's bankruptcy, etc.

Summary

The Income Tax Act adopts the principle of confirmation of rights and obligations, but it is impossible to impose income tax if it becomes impossible to recover due to the debtor's bankruptcy, etc. even if a claim that is the cause of income accrues.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim

The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of global income tax of KRW 98,976,050 for the Plaintiff on March 2, 2007 shall be revoked.

A judgment of the first instance court in the purport of an appeal shall be revoked. The plaintiff shall be dismissed.

Reasons

This court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow