logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.06.20 2017고단1664
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the actual operator of DaD located in the Gunsan-si C2nd, and the victim E is the person engaged in the scrap metal business in G located in Ulsan-si F, Ulsan-si, and H is the chairman of the J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “J”) located in Gunsan-si I.

In December 2015, the defendant was expected to remove the existing factory while moving the factory to the victim by telephone around the end of December, 2015, and the above J proposed that the removal of the factory will be done together with the removal of the factory, and the victim accepted it.

On January 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) prepared a “satisf contract for removal works” with the content that the Defendant and the victim would have the right to recommend the removal company owned by the J Union so that the Defendant and the victim can perform the removal work; and (b) received the agreement with H’s representative director K and H to grant the right to recommend the removal from H (which was drafted by JJ representative director K and H).

After completing meals, the defendant shall pay KRW 500 million to the victim outside the above restaurant in order to receive the J-reshing construction work clearly.

I would like to prepare a cost of KRW 500,000,000 and deliver it to H.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to deliver the money to H with the purchase fund of apartment, personal debt repayment, living expenses, etc.

Around February 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received transfer of KRW 10 million from the former North Bank account (M) in the name of L from the victim; and (c) received the delivery of KRW 450 million in total over 10 times, such as the statement in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant;

arrow