Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On May 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around August 28, 2014, and on September 10, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Gwangju District Court’s Net Branch Support, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around September 18, 2015.

1. Around May 25, 2009, the defrauded Defendant ordered the victim E to remove the F-Jinsung village and factory reconstruction work at the coffee shop in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul around May 25, 2009.

It would be possible to share the above construction work at the same time.

If it is not possible to do so, all money will be returned.

“The proposal was made.”

However, the defendant did not have been ordered to do the above construction, and he would have the construction work shared while performing the construction work as if he had been ordered to receive the above construction work.

There was no intention or ability to return money from the victims in return for the payment from many people.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and obtained the delivery of KRW 18 million from the victim on the same day and through D, and acquired it by fraud.

2. From July 27, 2009 to August 7, 2009, the defrauded Defendant is in the multilateral area of H’s H in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G from July 27, 2009 to July 27, 2009, via D, the said victim “F reconstruction works are late.”

Instead, the defendant ordered the reconstruction of the Gangnam-gu Seoul J apartment, and the construction is being carried out rapidly, so it would be possible to share the above construction with the money.

If it is not possible to do so, all money will be returned.

“The proposal was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have ordered the above J apartment reconstruction removal work, and would have the above construction work done as if he had been ordered to do so.

It receives money from many people as a consideration.