The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. Facts charged;

A. From around 1993, the Defendant and related parties were operating “I” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H from around 1993, the Defendant served as the president of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee for the Promotion of the Rearrangement of Nowon-gu (M) and the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee for the Promotion of the Rearrangement of Nowon-gu (N). From around 2003, the Defendant participated in the process of selecting each of the removal enterprises in the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee for the Promotion of the Rearrangement of

J. A housing redevelopment and rearrangement project partnership (hereinafter “association of this case”) in a housing redevelopment and rearrangement promotion zone refers to a zone that was approved by the committee of promoters on June 23, 2004, as a NN at the time when the committee of promoters was approved; hereinafter “N renewal promotion zone of this case”). A partnership established on January 7, 2008, as a group of cooperatives established on December 8, 2008, changed the integration and alteration into an O renewal promotion zone into an O renewal promotion zone, and a partnership that implements a redevelopment project that supplies 2,904 square meters of newly constructed apartment units with 144,694 square meters in Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P, Nowon-gu, and Q is a person who worked as the president from around 203 to June 2016 and worked as the head of the association from the time when the association was established.

R, a removal company (State) (S (State) (T), (State (State) as the president of the U.S., a person in charge of overall management of the above company, and (State) from around 2003, S operated its business to take charge of the removal of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government V Seoul Metropolitan Urban Renewal Promotion Zone.

In 203, the Defendant demanded Q, who was preparing to establish a committee for promotion, to apply Q’s right to select a project implementer to help Q to be the promotion chairperson by excluding other promotion committees in order to establish W, etc., and obtained Q’s consent. Around that time, the Defendant demanded Q’s right to request Q to use the promotion committee members at a canter and received 100 million won from R in terms of activity expenses, etc.

B. The Defendant, from around 2003, informed Q Q of the facts constituting the crime (State).