logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.21 2014고단6007
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who operates the construction business chain F in Daegu Dong-gu E.

1. On January 16, 2012, the Defendant acquiring proprietary benefits equivalent to KRW 68,200,000,000 is to pay KRW 68,20,000 within 10,000 per week to the removed company H (main employee) operated by the victim G, by removing the building on the ground in Daegu-gu, Seogu, and paying KRW 10,00,000 per week.

The phrase “a contract was entered into with the victim’s false statement,” and thereafter, the victim was from March 21, 2012 to the same year.

4. Until August 18, 200, the removal work had been ordered.

However, the fact is that the defendant's request for the removal of the land was made by the victim as the borrowed money, and the wages of the employees were not paid properly, and even if the removal was made by another person due to no particular property, there was no intention or ability to pay the cost.

Accordingly, the Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 68.2 million from the injured party.

2. On January 18, 2012, the Defendant shall pay to the victim immediately after the completion of the removal work already requested, with the loan of KRW 10 million to the victim within the F Office of the F Office of the Resolution for the Settlement of Disputes.

“Falsely speaking,” and having received KRW 10 million from the injured party.

However, the fact is that the defendant was requested to remove the land from the victim, and the amount of the J site purchase fund was also raised as the loan, and the employee's wages were not paid properly, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money from the other person, even if there was no specific property.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired 10 million won from the injured party.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant entered into the instant removal construction contract with H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) to sell a newly-built urban residential house, and borrows or invests ten million won from other persons at the time of borrowing.

arrow