Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 5, 2016, at around 04:00, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s 5th floor of the Victim C’s “D’s operation,” located in Busan Southern-gu, without any particular reason, that “No. 508 is a person who has been suffering from 508”; (b) expressed that “No. 508 is in the guest room” to the victim’s speech, “No. 508 is in the guest room”. However, the Defendant expressed that “no. 508 is in the guest room.”

In addition, the defendant followed the victim who gets off to the 1st floor gate, and then obstructed the victim's motherel business by avoiding the disturbance between about 25 minutes, such as making a 25 minutes of the disturbance on the front floor of the said gate, and making a request from the victim for a calculation of the fee, making a cover of or making a cover of the fee from the victim.

2. The Defendant, at the above time and time, experienced the disturbance from the victim F, who was in the position of the Busan Southern Police Station E-district of the Busan Police Station, called the victim F, who was in the position of the Busan Police Station E-district, and was called the victim, thereby publicly insulting the victim with a large voice that “the stick of the public has been distorted,” while the victim, who was in the position of the above Mara, C, and the police officer of the East Police Station, was in the hearing of G, a police officer of the above Maur. The Mara, C, E-gu, Mague, Mague, several fingers, rings, rings, a person who knows in Seoul National Police Agency, rings, rings, and rings,” and openly insulting the victim.

3. When the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender such as obstruction of business from F on the above date, time and place of obstruction of performance of official duties by police officers, the Defendant assaulted the above F on one occasion, on the ground that he saw, “Choee fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning F’s handling of the above F’s 112 Reporting Cases and the arrest of flagrant offenders as above.

Summary of Evidence

1...