A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 3, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 02:45 on July 3, 2020, the Defendant: (b) sent a door to the victim C (Nam, 26 years of age) who was seated on the rear seat of a vehicle parked at the front of the Ulsan-gu B market; (c) opened the victim’s shoulder on the ground that the victim C (Nam, and 26 years of age) was fluencing himself; and (d) assaulted the victim’s face at one time by drinking.

2. Around July 3, 2020: (a) around 02:55, the Defendant insultingd the victim D (Nam, 31 years of age) who was dispatched to the police after receiving a report of assault at the places specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) by the Defendant at the police officer’s location, on July 3, 2020, by stating that “I see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, see, and see, see, see, see, see,

3. The Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties, at the date, time, and place mentioned in the above paragraph (2) above, opened the front door of the patrol vehicle in order to move to the patrol vehicle to handle other 112 reported cases after the police officers processed the said assault case, and opened the patrol vehicle by force. The Defendant obstructed the operation of the patrol vehicle, and obstructed the operation of the patrol vehicle, and the police assistantF belonging to the Ulsannam Police Station E-gu, Ulsannam Police Station E-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by stating, “I am feas is immediately known, but I am feas,” and expressed the same attitude as I am to F when I am am f.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement F, D, and C following the closure of each police's statement;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;