logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.04.30 2014고단3210
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On April 27, 2007, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license), a summary order of one million won or more as a fine for the violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court, and a summary order of four million won or more as a fine in the same court on September 13, 2013, issued by the same court.

On July 4, 2014, at around 21:21:21, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a car with a volume of 500 meters from the trade name in the middle of the window of Changwon-si to the front day of the small line in the same Dong from the window of the window of Changwon-si to the front day of the small line in the same Dong.

2. When the Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document was controlled by drinking driving at the above time and at the above place, the Defendant presented an official document to the Defendant’s f’s driver’s license, who was attending the meeting and was demanded to present an identification card by the Assistant Inspector E belonging to the Chang Military Police Station, and presented the Defendant’s letter of credit.

3. Private signature, forgery, and uttering of a false investigation or signature;

A. At the above date, at the above place, the Defendant requested E to prepare a signature column of the Statement on the State Drivers' Status Statement and the State Drivers' Name Measurement Note, and forged F’s signature without authority for the purpose of exercising F’s name in the driver column of each of the above documents, and issued each of the above documents to E who is unaware of the forged facts, and exercised it.

B. The Defendant, at the above date and time, prepared a notice of the result of drinking driving control with respect to F using PDA (PDA), and forged F’s signature without authority for the purpose of exercising the F’s name by entering the F’s name in the column for driver signature of the notice of PDA screen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. A E-document;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. A drinking driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;

arrow