logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.06.11 2015고단2177
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a dial vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.108%, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the front side of the “Iro shopping center” located in 13 South-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul, to the front side of the “C” located in the same Gu B, around 23:35 on the same day; (b) around 300 meters from the road to the front side of the “C” located in the same Gu B.

2. On March 12, 2015, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) requested a police officer affiliated with the Incheon Southern Police Station of the Incheon Southern Police Station that was under the influence of drinking on the road “C” as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) on the road; (b) used another person’s resident registration number unlawfully in a way that the Defendant’s pre-paid Defendant’s pre-paid F resident registration number refers to one’s resident registration number as if he were his resident registration number.

3. The Defendant forged the signature of the above F for the purpose of exercising his signature by signing it in the column of the driver’s signature of the notification of the result of the drinking driving control of a portable information terminal (PDA) in a police officer at the time and place specified in the above 2.1, and at the same time, the Defendant used the aforesaid F for the purpose of uttering, and issued the portable Information Terminal to E, who is aware of the forgery.

4. The Defendant forged a private document, at the date and time, at the place specified in the above 2.2., stated that he was required to sign the “Report on the Statement on the Status of the Drivers,” and stated “F” as the promise of the “Report on the Investigation of the Case,” and stated that he was required to sign it on the column, which is the promise of the “Report on the Statement on the Status of the Drivers,” and used each forged “Report on the Statement on the Status of the Drivers,” which is a private document related to the fact-finding, under the name of F without authority for the purpose of exercising the right by arbitrarily affixing the Defendant’s personal seal on his name, and one copy of the “Report on the Statement on the Status of the Drivers,” which is a private document related to the

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow