A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 22:25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) attended the funeral ceremony F of the Defendant’s pro-friendly arrest network F of the Defendant’s E put in the Government-Si of Gyeonggi-do at the D Hospital funeral hall; (b) and (c) took a bath to the visitors and residents in the place; and (d) was arrested in a flagrant act committed against the Defendant, who is a police officer belonging to the Gu Government Police Station G Zone G Zone, dispatched after receiving a report, and was arrested as a police officer of the Defendant’s Government Police Station G Zone G Zone, and was led to the commission of the offense committed against the Defendant’s remaining assault to H at the Government-Si of Gyeonggi-do around 22:55 on the same day.

In order to be investigated due to drunk driving, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. At around 01:00 on September 9, 2014, the Defendant engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties to the Defendant E, who is investigated as a victim of violence in the criminal guidance office of the police station located in the Dong-dong Office of the Government-Si Office of Gyeonggi-do, and continued to return to the office inside the office. In order to protect the personal safety of K and prevent escape, the police officer, belonging to the police station of the Gu government police station, took the Defendant on hand and take the Defendant into the atmosphere, take the Defendant’s walk, take the Defendant’s walk against the defect, and down the chest into the atmosphere, and pushed the chest with the left arms, and pushed the bat at least two meters.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the maintenance of order in the police station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and L;

1. A statement of H, M and N;

1. Application of Ctv Images Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment) regarding criminal facts.