1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company that operates pop-in-time Internet TV (htp:/www.popkonv.com; hereinafter “instant site”) among the Internet web sites where its members become its members and become viewers and view the broadcasts of other members, and provide relevant services so that the performers and viewers can exchange conversations through mutual hosting functions.

B. The Plaintiff has been working as a separate name “B” and “C” on the instant website. Since 2015, the Plaintiff has continuously been working as a separate name from other members, especially members using a separate name “D” (hereinafter “D members”), or its suspected members, for several times since 2015, demanded the limitation on the use of the ID by reporting to the Defendant.

C. From the end of January 2015 or around February 1, 2015, the Plaintiff obstructed the broadcast process of the above E members, such as: (a) the Plaintiff classified certain members from the Internet broadcast run by the E-based member “E” (hereinafter “E member”); and (b) paying time expenses to the effect that he/she is the said D member.

E Members requested the Plaintiff to refrain from doing so through the function of the site of this case.

The Plaintiff posted a notice on the Plaintiff’s M-channel (the message board of individual members on the website of this case) to the effect that the content of the page sent by the said E members would be clear as D members and that the said E members would repeat the same behavior against the said members in the future.

Accordingly, on February 1, 2015, a member reported to the Defendant on February 1, 2015, that the Plaintiff interfered with the broadcast proceeding, thereby taking appropriate measures.

Defendant of the same month

4. The Plaintiff sent the details of the Plaintiff’s report to the Plaintiff via the internal function of the site of this case.