beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s annual interest in KRW 52,491,159 and KRW 16,010,936 among the Plaintiff, from January 9, 2016 to August 12, 2016.
Reasons
1. 원ㆍ피고 사이의 금전소비대차 거래내역에 관하여 일시 대여금액 변제금액 충당 구분 2007-03-29 6,000,000 2007-03-30 3,000,000 원금 충당 2007-04-27 6,000,000 2007-05-28 5,200,000 2007-05-29 1,600,000 2007-07-24 2,620,000 원금 충당 2007-08-09 1,000,000 2007-08-22 1,000,000 2007-08-27 2,000,000 원금 충당 2007-09-27 3,000,000 원금 충당 2007-10-29 1,800,000 2007-11-09 1,500,000 2007-11-27 25,000,000 2007-12-11 1,600,000 2007-12-17 600,000 2007-12-26 6,100,000 2007-12-29 2,000,000 2008-03-03 23,000,000 원금 충당 2008-03-20 700,000 2008-04-25 300,000 2008-08-07 300,000 2008-09-05 1,000,000 2009-03-27 300,000 2009-05-15 350,000 2010-05-31 240,000 2010-08-13 454,000 2010-08-31 50,000 2011-01-29 200,000 합계 52,640,000 44,274,000 갑 제2호증, 을 제1, 2호증의 각 기재, 증인 C의 증언에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 원고가 2007. 3. 29. 피고에게 6,000,000원을 이자 월 10%로 정하여 대여한 것을 비롯하여 2010. 5. 31.까지 위 표 기재와 같이 합계 52,640,000원을 대여한 사실, 한편 원고가 2007. 5. 29.경 피고로부터 1,600,000원을 변제받으면서 이자를 월 1,000,000원으로 변경하기로 약정한 사실을 인정할 수 있고, 달리 반증이 없다
(A) The Defendant’s assertion that he did not agree with interest shall not be accepted. The Plaintiff asserted that on November 27, 2007, the Defendant additionally lent KRW 25,000,000 in cash, separate from KRW 25,00,000 as indicated in the above table, to the Defendant. However, the entries in the evidence No. 4 alone are insufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Meanwhile, according to the aforementioned evidence, the Defendant’s performance of KRW 44,274,00 in total to the Plaintiff from March 30, 2007 to January 29, 201 can be acknowledged.
2. As to the validity of the repayment agreement of KRW 60,000,000 on the certificate of borrowing (Evidence A 1) with the Defendant on March 24, 2010, the Plaintiff’s principal and interest on the loan during that period between the Defendant and the Defendant on March 24, 2010.