beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay Plaintiff A KRW 12,173,90, KRW 23,395,750 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 21,335,370 to Plaintiff C, respectively.
Reasons
1. Details, etc. of ruling;
(a) project implementation plan authorization, announcement, etc. - Project name: D housing redevelopment and rearrangement project - Project implementer: Defendant - Project implementation plan authorization and announcement: Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public notification on June 15, 201;
B. Decision of expropriation made on August 25, 2017 by the local Land Tribunal of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Fdong”): (1) Plaintiff A: 202 of a sectioned building on the ground of 248 square meters in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Fdong”); (2) Plaintiff B: 201 of a sectioned building on the ground of H large scale 874 square meters; and (3) Plaintiff C: 401 of a sectioned building of 235 square meters in I large scale 235 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Section A”; and (401 of a sectioned building of 235 square meters in I large scale 235 square meters (hereinafter “the subject subject matter of expropriation”). - The subject matter of expropriation compensation is combined with Plaintiff A258,145,000, Plaintiff B298,700, Plaintiff C389,030,050,000 won, additional charges - Plaintiff 205,251.
[) Plaintiff B, Plaintiff B 1,227,530 won (=298,70,000 won x 10 days (10 days from May 16, 2017 to May 25, 2017) x 0.15 x 3,836,740 won (=389,03,000 x 24 days (from May 2, 2017 to May 25, 2017) x 0.15 x 0.15 x 24 days)/365 x 24 days from expropriation date: An appraisal corporation: a certified public appraisal corporation, a certified public appraisal corporation, and a third-party trust company.
C. As a result of the court appraiser J’s appraisal (hereinafter “court appraiser”) (hereinafter “the above appraiser’s appraisal result,” “court appraiser’s appraisal result,” “court appraisal result,” Plaintiff A and C’s sectioned building, transaction cases regarding the Section 301 (former size: 71.56 square meters, date of approval for use: October 13, 2003; date of transaction: April 28, 2017); Plaintiff B’s Section B’s Section 302 of a partitioned building on the ground (former size: 41.6 square meters, date of approval for use: November 29, 1986; date of transaction: September 19, 2016) shall be selected as transaction comparison cases, and comparative factors, etc. between the subject matter of expropriation and the subject matter of expropriation in this case.