logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.01.16 2018구단58670
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,894,600 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from October 21, 2017 to January 16, 2019.

Reasons

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Business name: A business name: B housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (project size of 36,427.6m2, hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant - A public notice of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Gang-gu”) on April 4, 2013

B. The Seoul Special Metropolitan City Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on May 26, 2017 - The subject matter of expropriation: Eunpyeong-gu D (hereinafter “Ddong”) owned by the Plaintiff, and multi-family houses on the same site (hereinafter “each subject matter of expropriation in this case”; and “the instant land” and “the instant multi-family house” are “land” and “the instant building”) - The adjudication of expropriation compensation for expropriation: ① KRW 383,31,220 of each subject matter of expropriation in this case (= KRW 71,941,950 of each subject matter of expropriation in this case) and ② Additional charges under Article 30(3) of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”); ② The period of delay, additional charges,362,740 won (hereinafter “38,31,320,365, Feb. 36, 201); and the period of delay in expropriation x 365,2016.

- The date of commencement of expropriation:

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on February 22, 2018 - The adjudication on compensation for losses on the objection: ① each of the instant objects of expropriation KRW 383,384,00 (= KRW 71,361,200 in each of the instant objects of expropriation (i.e., the instant building of KRW 312,02,80 in each of the instant objects of expropriation); ② Additional dues for delay: KRW 48,369,400 in each of the instant objects of expropriation (i.e., KRW 383, 331,20 in each of the instant objects of expropriation x 0.15 x 0.15 x 307/365

D. The result of the court appraiser J’s appraisal on the instant land (the plaintiff did not file an application for appraisal on the instant building; hereinafter the above appraiser’s appraisal is referred to as “court appraiser” and the above appraisal as “court appraisal”) - The court appraiser at the court appraiser at the Eunpyeong-gu 11 square meters [the status of use: detached house: a specific use area: a Class-I general use area; a Class-I general residential area; a traffic volume (a) and a shape slope: a small slope].

arrow