logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.01.18 2017구단55582
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 26,900,000 as well as 5% per annum from March 11, 2016 to July 20, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name (1) Business name: The location and size of the housing redevelopment project (2) for the increased 2 financial renewal acceleration zone: The project implementer who is the project implementer of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 213-20 one-day large 78,75.2m2m2 (3): the process of the project; Defendant (4);

B. (1) From among multi-household houses with five floors of reinforced concrete in Eunpyeong-dong, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City subject to expropriation on January 20, 2017 (1) of the Local Land Tribunal of Seoul Metropolitan City: 301 square meters of the housing 69.97 square meters owned by the Plaintiff (57.49 square meters in front of the public wound), 6.29 square meters in the stairs room, 1.56 square meters in the management room, 26.9/211.2 square meters in the housing site shares, 26.9/211 in the housing site shares (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s partitioned building”), compensation for losses: 178,00,000,000 won in the Plaintiff’s partitioned building: The date of expropriation of reinforced concrete in the ground of reinforced concrete building, 301 square meters in the Seoul Metropolitan City, 301 to 300 square meters in the total appraisal appraisal report, 17 through 43 evidence No.

2. Determination:

A. The Plaintiff’s compensation for damages calculated in the adjudication on acceptance of the gist of the Plaintiffs’ assertion did not reflect the neighboring local market price, and the Plaintiff’s compensation for damages was low by selecting and evaluating improper transaction cases.

The amount of compensation according to the results of the court appraisal shall be increased.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

C. As a result of the court’s market price appraisal of appraiser A, the Plaintiff’s partitioned building was assessed as KRW 204,90,000.

A court appraiser shall be the part of the building which is the object of sectional ownership.

arrow