logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.05.09 2017고정407
절도
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 25, 2017, the Defendant, at around 20:00, at the “D” male escape room located in the former Northern-gun C, the Defendant concealed the 832,000 won in cash owned by the victim, Samsung Credit Card 1, Samsung Credit Card 1, Hyundai Credit Card 1, Samsung Credit Card 1, one card, one card, and one copy of the operation license, and one copy of the joint string in his own clothes.

2. In a case where there is no direct evidence, such as witness’s statement, it can be found guilty only if it can be inferred to the extent that the facts charged are true without reasonable doubt by applying the logical and empirical rules to indirect facts acknowledged by legitimate evidence. If it is impossible to form a conviction to such an extent, even if there is doubt as to the defendant’s guilt, it is the major principle of criminal procedure that the defendant’s interest should be judged as the defendant’s interest (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do1326, Jan. 13, 201). According to the witness’s witness’s legal statement, E’s statement, list of search and seizure and evidence, scene and list of evidence, CCTV video-recording photographs, investigation report (to hear victim’s telephone statement), and the fact that the defendant was found to have not been aware of the fact that the victim was using the victim’s clothes from the police room in the instant case, and that the victim was found to have not been aware of the fact that the victim was using the victim’s clothes.

According to the above facts, the above facts of recognition are examined.

arrow