1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

2.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant and D, and E, intented to subscribe to insurance in the name of the Defendant who was designated as a producer by the Korean Racing Association for the joint-owned horses of D and E by using the support of 50% insurance premium in the case of purchasing the livestock disaster insurance by a producer from the Korean Racing Association.

D and E, around February 201, purchased “C” (variety: Sheblet, gender, and date of birth) produced by the Defendant from “G farm” located in “G farm in Seoposi City,” and asked the Defendant to entrust the Defendant with the management of the said horses under the name of the Defendant, and requested the Defendant to purchase the livestock disaster insurance. On March 25, 2011, the Defendant consented to the purchase of the said horses under the name of the Defendant at the ticket point of the Agricultural Cooperative Damage Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., for the said horses in the name of the Defendant: the policyholder and the insured; the insurance period from March 25, 2011 to March 25, 2012; the amount of the insurance coverage: 30 million won; the Minister for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries deceiving the victim of the livestock disaster insurance on his own horses owned by the producer, and had the victim’s public official in charge pay KRW 50 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Disaster Insurance Co., Ltd.

Accordingly, the defendant, D, and E acquired the above 1,761,00 won in collusion.

2. The Defendant committed attempted fraud and violated the Animal Protection Act (hereinafter “I”) committed a violation of “I” (variety: hybrid, gender, date of birth: J) which was owned by the Defendant, but failed to function as a racing. As such, the Defendant was able to receive insurance money by making the said horses excessive.

No person who violates the Animal Protection Act shall incur an injury to an animal without justifiable grounds, such as necessity of veterinary treatment and damage to the life, body, or property of a person due to an animal.

The Defendant, on August 20, 2012, is in Western-si F.