The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who operates a “D farm” in Seopopo City C.

The Defendant knew that at the time of purchasing the livestock disaster insurance for horses, he would calculate the sales price at the time of purchasing the livestock disaster insurance for horses to the insurable value, and told the Defendant to claim excessive payment for the livestock disaster insurance by preparing and submitting a sales contract stating that he would cover the sales price for the Mani-MaMa (variety, gender: cancer, date of birth: April 8, 2008).

On October 4, 2010, the Defendant: (a) concluded an insurance contract (the policyholder and the insured: E; and (b) concluded on October 5, 2010 with the content that the Defendant’s mother was born in the above farm and registered in the name of the Defendant, but only transferred the name of the Defendant’s mother to E; (c) sold the said horse to E in the absence of the fact that the Defendant actually sold the said horse to E; and (d) on October 5, 2010, the Defendant filed a false sales contract with the victim Nonghyup Property Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., to purchase the livestock disaster insurance for the said horse at the above farm, and filed a false sales contract with the victim and the said horse as the subject matter of the insurance, and claimed payment of insurance money of KRW 50 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

However, even if the defendant did not sell the above horses to E, he determined the amount of the insurance contract by deceiving the victim as if sold in 60 million won, and he claimed the amount of the insurance contract to the victim.

As above, the Defendant deceptioned the victim, and received KRW 35 million from the victim as insurance money on July 4, 201, as the agricultural bank account in the name of E (F).

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and let E receive the property.

2. Determination

(a) the witness G is in this Court, and “the accused is one’s pro-Japanese and is fostering.”