1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is to delete the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, other than reprimand (it is inappropriate for the court to predict the appropriate type of disciplinary action against the plaintiff) that “In accordance with the criteria for disciplinary action prescribed in the attached Table of Article 2 of the Rules on Disciplinary Measures, etc. of Public Educational Officials, according to the level of non-guilty punishment, etc., the disciplinary action against the plaintiff is deemed to fall under reprimand (in a case where the degree of non-guilty punishment is weak and transitional).” As such, it is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.