All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence declared by the prosecutor by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. As to each of the unfair sentencing arguments by the Defendant and the prosecutor, it is recognized that the Defendant: (a) led the instant crime as a counselor in charge of inducing the Defendant to purchase a mobile phone by telephone; (b) seems that the actual profit would not be significant if compared to the total damage amount; and (c) paid out damage to certain victims.

However, the crime of this case committed the so-called “singing” crime against an unspecified number of victims in a systematic, planned, and repeated manner. The crime of this case was committed by the defendant. The crime of “singing” was committed by a person who takes part in the so-called “singing” crime against an unspecified number of victims. The crime of “sing” took the role of telephone counselor in a crime of “singing” as a major target of a major crime, resulting in a situation where victims are more difficult to reach, and serious damage to the trust of state agencies of the general society, financial institutions, etc., as well as direct victims, and social harm is very serious. The crime of “singing” that appeared in Korea for a long time without eradicating media publicity and the intensive regulation and punishment by judicial agencies, and is committed by the defendant. The defendant played the role of telephone counselor, and the defendant took part in the crime of “singing” as a whole in the direct action of deceiving victims.

in this section; and