The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Defendant

B. b.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Each sentence sentenced by the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Each of the above types sentenced by the court below by the prosecutor is too unhued and unfair.

2. Regarding the defendants and prosecutor's unfair argument of sentencing, the crime of this case was committed by the defendants in a systematic, planned, and repeated manner. The crime of this case was committed by the defendants against many unspecified victims. The crime of " Bosing" was committed as a major crime against the economically and socially weak, and the crime was committed as a major crime. The crime was committed as a direct crime of the victims, such as making it difficult for the victims more difficult to do so, and seriously damaging the trust of the government agencies of the general society, financial institutions, etc., as well as the direct victims, and causing very serious social harm. The crime of " Bosinging" which appeared in Korea for a long time is very serious. The crime of " Bosinging" is committed without eradicating despite the media promotion and the intensive control and punishment by the judicial agencies, and it is necessary for the defendants to take part in the crime of " Bosinging" as well as the victims who take part in the crime of " Bosing", and the defendants play a role of telephone counselor, and the crime was committed as a direct deception of the victims.

It can not be seen, and it is recognized that the victims are many victims and the amount of damage is large, but the damage has not been recovered.

However, the defendants were led to the crime of this case as counselors in charge of inducing them to purchase mobile phones by telephone, and the defendants A did not lead the crime of this case.