1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, ..

1. According to the records of the final judgment subject to review, the following facts are recognized:

A. On February 6, 1980, the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) was appointed as police officers and served under the jurisdiction of the Port North Korea Police Station, and on January 28, 1987, the Plaintiff was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on the disturbance of drinking alcohol around 03:00 on January 28, 1987, and 2 of the upper part (2 of the upper part) was cut back by ices while sprinking the person who was in danger. The Plaintiff was dismissed from office on January 13, 1998.

B. The Plaintiff received from the above two pathic treatment for two pathics who were deprived of, as seen above,. For the pathic (Ma11), the Plaintiff left the vegetables over two adjacent pathics (Ma12) and the face value (Ma13). The Plaintiff also left the vegetables (Ma22) and the face value (Ma23) on the left side, as well as on the left side (Ma21).

C. However, two dental services were additionally excluded from Ma12, Ma13-2, and two dental services were lost due to the fact that Ma22, Ma23-2, and Ma23 have lost its function as normal dental services.

On February 26, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for the registration of persons of distinguished services to the State with the Defendant, asserting that the four additional damages were caused by the post-refilled treatment (Ma12, Ma13, Ma12, Ma13, Ma22, and Ma23). As such, the Plaintiff filed an application for the registration of persons of distinguished services to the State with the Defendant, by asserting that the total of six infants (Ma11, Ma12, Ma12, Ma13, Ma13, Ma21, Ma22, Ma23, hereinafter referred to as “instant baby”).

E. Accordingly, on May 4, 2010, the Defendant rendered a disposition of partial recognition of the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State, which was recognized as having been on duty only for the entire escape of “abstinence of the upper left and right,” which was a two son who was first deprived of, following a deliberation by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, and subsequently rendered a disposition of physical examination for disability classification to the effect that the two paths of May 28, 2010 fall short of the criteria for disability rating.

(F) The Plaintiff, as the Daejeon District Court Decision 2010Gudan2031, Nov. 30, 2015, is the head of the Hongsung (hereinafter “instant disposition”).