1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 6, 1980, the Plaintiff was appointed to police officers and served under the jurisdiction of the Port Coast Guard. On January 28, 1987, at around 03:00, the Plaintiff was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on the disturbance of drinking alcohol on January 28, 1987, and was forced to straw up to two straws (two straws in bad faith). The Plaintiff was dismissed from office on January 13, 1998.

B. The Plaintiff received from the above two pathic treatment for two pathics who were deprived of, as seen above,. For the pathic (Ma11), the Plaintiff left the vegetables over two adjacent pathics (Ma12) and the face value (Ma13). The Plaintiff also left the vegetables (Ma22) and the face value (Ma23) on the left side, as well as on the left side (Ma21).

C. However, two dental services were additionally excluded from Ma12, Ma13-2, and two dental services were lost due to the fact that Ma22, Ma23-2, and Ma23 have lost its function as normal dental services.

On February 26, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for the registration of persons of distinguished services to the State with the Defendant, asserting that the four additional damages incurred during the process of Bostein Treatment (Ma11, Ma12, Ma13, Ma13, Ma21, Ma22, and Ma23) were caused by Bostein Treatment, and that the total six pas (hereinafter “the instant pas”) was damaged by reason of performance of official duties.

E. Accordingly, on May 4, 2010, the Defendant rendered a disposition of partial recognition of the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant Disposition 1”) that recognized only for the entire escape of “abstinence of the upper left and right”, which was first rejected through the deliberation of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, as a whole. After a physical examination, on May 28, 2010, the Defendant issued a disposition of physical examination for disability rating classification to the effect that it falls short of the criteria for disability rating (hereinafter “instant Disposition 2”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 13 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. In addition to the relevant laws and regulations, the entries are as follows.