logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.08.09 2012구단5279
전공상 추가상이처 불인정 결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 6, 1979, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on February 29, 1992.

B. On December 29, 2010, around April 1980, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State, 2 the front and the second half of which were cut by facing the head of the relative player during the combat sports axis.

On April 29, 2011, the Defendant rendered a non-applicable decision on the ground that the first outbreak circumstance cannot be confirmed, and that the record of the obligation on the part of the child’s damage cannot be confirmed.

C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation with the District Court (201Gudan2284) seeking the revocation of the said non-specific decision, and the said court recommended to make an adjustment to the effect that the said non-specific decision should be changed to the military police for support, following the examination of evidence on the developments leading up to the occurrence

On May 16, 2012, the defendant accepted this, and decided that two higher-class (11, 21 upper-class and second-class and second-class (31, 41 lower-class and second-class) of the plaintiff's upper-class (21 upper-class and second-class and second-class) were different from official duties, but the negligence or the negligence of the person himself/herself, which had no inevitable reason, concurrently occurred, shall be deemed to have occurred, and thus, constitutes the requirements of Article 73-2 (1) of the former Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (amended by Act No. 11041, Sep. 15, 201; hereinafter referred to as the "former Act on Persons of Distinguished

In accordance with this decision, the plaintiff was subject to a new physical examination on June 28, 2012, but a judgment in the other grade (in the case of loss of at least five of the dental officers, or in the case of a person in need of a scrap metal or a scrap metal, Grade VII 305) was issued.

(A) On July 5, 2012, the Defendant: (a) rendered a decision below the disability rating; and (b) rendered a decision outside the rating on August 24, 2012, on a physical examination by a new trial. (c) E.

In addition to the wounds during the stable games around June 29, 2012 and April 1980, the Plaintiff is additionally suffering from the injury of the 3th military academy around December 1989, the Plaintiff’s “malary treatment, loss of the course of controlling the right side of the fright side of the fright,” such as loss of the fright side of the fright side of the fright and the fright side of the fright side of the fright side of the fright side of the fright side of the fright side of the fright side of the fright side.”

arrow