(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.01.15 2013고정967

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.01.15 2013고정967

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 20, 2012, around 15:20 on October 20, 2012, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim E by taking the victim’s desire to read “Cropaba,” “Cropab,” “Cropty,” “Cropty,” and “Cropaba,” to the victim E.

2. The Defendant: (a) assaulted the victim E by ice coffee contained in a disposable plastic container at the time and place, such as that set forth in paragraph (1); and (b) destroyed a coffee amounting to KRW 750,000 in the market price, as the ice coffee contained in the plastic container falls into the coffee, such as Scafama, in which the victim is being selected, and then damaged the coffee amounting to KRW 750,00 in a price.

3. At the same time and place as Paragraph 1, the Defendant interfered with the business of “D” coffee specialty by taking about 10 minutes, such as taking a bath to and assaulting the victim as set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. A complaint;

1. A written estimate for a report on internal investigation;

1. Determination of the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion

1. As to the assertion that there was no intention to cause damage to property, the defendant and his defense counsel asserts to the effect that there was no intention to cause damage since the coffee was set up as a catus within the meaning of a claim with the order of the defendant in the process of setting it to the consignee.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, that is, the Defendant stated at an investigative agency that “I see in the place where coffees work is carried out without being processed by coffees,” and “I see in the place where coffees work is carried out,” the Defendant seems to have been aware of the circumstances that the Defendant would be damaged at the time of the instant crime, and thus, it appears that I would have accepted the remainder of such a result.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고단3128

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2019.11.15 2019고정581

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.07.22 2014고단1428

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.09.04 2013고정871

-대구지방법원 2018.02.09 2017고합440