Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Daegu District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 11, 2014. On June 29, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on October 7, 2017 by imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

On October 5, 201, while serving as a staff member of the Seo-gu Office C Office in Daegu, the Defendant opened D’s mobile phone (E) around October 5, 201, subscribed to F Internet and TV services in the name of D without D’s consent for performance of his work, and was willing to claim fees in combination with D’s mobile phone.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On October 24, 2011, the Defendant forged the F Internet and TV “service application form” on the name column of “D”, “G”, “H”, and “Seoul-gu I” without authority for the purpose of exercising at the said office, and forged one copy of “service application form” with respect to the F Internet and TV in the name column of “service application form”, “G”, and “G” and “Tgu-gu I” in the contact column. The Internet column’s application rate system and the arrangement period are in place, respectively, and the application form for TV column is in place, “J” and “three years,” respectively, and then the application form for service in the end of the document form was forged by stating “D” as “D” in the applicant column of the end of the document form, and making D private persons subsequent thereto, thereby forging a copy of “service application” with respect to D’s Internet and TV.

B. The Defendant, who combines the above service and the mobile phone, stated “E” and “G” in the cell phone number column of “E” in the cell phone number column of “E” kept without authority for the purpose of uttering at the same place on the same day, and forged one copy of the “K Admission Agreement” which combines the service and the mobile phone by stating “D” in the applicant column and making D private persons next thereto.

2. The defendant is identical to the above day.