beta
Cases
2017du75101 The revocation of revocation of a disposition to refuse to correct a salary class
Plaintiff, Appellee
Attached List 1 is as shown in the List of Plaintiffs (A and 13 others)
Plaintiff Appellant
Attached List 2 is as shown in the List of Plaintiffs (B and two others)
Defendant, Appellee and Appellant
The Director of the Central Office Building Management Office
The judgment below
Seoul High Court Decision 2017Nu48477 Decided November 17, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
March 29, 2018
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal between the plaintiffs B, C, D and the defendant are assessed against the above plaintiffs, and the remainder of the costs of appeal between the plaintiffs and the defendant are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds of each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, all appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by
March 29, 2018
Judges
Justices Lee Ki-taik
Chief Justice Kim Shin
Justices Park Sang-ok
Justices Park Jung-hwa
Attached Form
A person shall be appointed.
A person shall be appointed.