logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 12. 15. 선고 2016두49396 판결
(심리불속행) 조세회피목적 명의신탁의 증여세 및 부당무신고가산세 적법 여부[일부패소]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-3238 ( August 10, 2016)

Title

(Trial Incompetence) Whether the gift tax on title trust for tax avoidance purpose and the additional tax on improper non-report are legitimate

Summary

(In the first instance, the imposition of gift tax on title trust for the purpose of tax avoidance is lawful, but it is difficult for the plaintiffs to recognize that they had not reported the tax base in an unjust manner according to the title trust.

Related statutes

Article 45-2 (1) of the former Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Article 47-2 (2) 1 of the former Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2016Du49396 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

00 et al. 3

Defendant-Appellee

00. Head of tax office and 2

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-3238 ( August 10, 2016)

Imposition of Judgment

December 15, 2016

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Of the costs of appeal, the portion arising between Plaintiff Aa, BB, C and Defendant e and the Head of the District Tax Office, and the Head of the District Tax Office are borne by each party, and the portion arising between Plaintiff Aa, gg and Defendant hhh are borne by the said Plaintiffs.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow