logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.02.05 2015고단1968
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 25, 2008, the Defendant joined C (State) and worked as an agent at the site of the 5 small-scale establishment works, the installation works of the brine resource-making facilities, and the construction works of the 5 coke facility installation works.

1. From the end of December 1, 2008, the Defendant: (a) using a computer at the office at the 5 small-scale office in the above D Special Metropolitan City E around the end of December 2008, the Defendant: (b) even though F had not worked as a daily employee at the above construction site from December 1, 2008 to December 31, 200 of the same year, the Defendant prepared a daily labor cost payment statement as if F had worked for the above construction site amounting to KRW 2,50,000 per daily labor cost during the above period; (c) submitted it to the victim C (State); (d) from the employees in charge of the Victim C (State Accounting) accounting, the Defendant deducted employment premium, etc. from the post office in the name of head of Tong (Account number:G) on January 19, 2009 to receive KRW 2,532,590 under the pretext of labor cost from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2019

2. The Defendant, around March 9, 2009, using computers at the site offices in the construction site offices of brine resource-generating facilities in the above D, E at the end of lightyang-si, and H from March 9, 2009 to the same year.

3. From April 20, 200 to June 21, 2010, H, even though he did not work as a daily employee at the above construction site, he was prepared a daily labor expense payment statement of KRW 90,980,000 per daily labor cost for the above construction site, and submitted it to the victim C (a week) as if he had performed an act equivalent to the sum of KRW 1,980,000 per daily labor cost for the above construction period. He was transferred KRW 16,459,500 in total over 10 times from that time to June 21, 2010, after deducting employment premium from the victim C (Account Number: I)’s employee in charge of accounting at the victim C (the victim’s passbook)’s passbook (Account Number) and receiving transfer of KRW 1,971,00 as labor cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;

arrow