logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.05.22 2012고단2101
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding seven hundred thousand won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In spite of the fact that the owner of a motor vehicle is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, the defendant operated the motor vehicle on October 24, 2012 by driving a motor vehicle of B SP area which was not covered by mandatory insurance and driving the motor vehicle on the road, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, with the point of 76 km in the Seoul, the Seoul, SP area New Metropolitan City, Kimpo-si, along with the first line from the front area to the front area.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and the main sentence of Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant: (a) the date and time indicated in the facts charged in the instant case; (b) the driving of the said B SP car in close to the front vehicle while neglecting the front vehicle while driving the said B SP car at the place; (c) due to occupational negligence that did not discover that the vehicle driven prior to the front vehicle while neglecting the front vehicle; (d) the Defendant received the rear portion of the D PP truck drivened by the victim C (4 years old); (c) the said SP truck was pushed the front portion of the said PP truck driven driven by the victim E (27 years old); and (d) the Defendant received the rear portion of the FV truck driven driven by the victim E (35 years old); and (e) the Defendant received the back portion of the said HV car that is driven by the victim G (35 years old); and (e) the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing his duties, caused the victim to suffer an injury to the victim C such as the victim’s HV car requiring treatment for about four weeks.

arrow