Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner who operates a singing practice hall with the trade name "D" from Songpa-gu C and the second floor of Songpa-gu Seoul, and Defendant B is one person who provided entertainment services at the above business establishment.

1. Defendant A

(a) Any person who intends to run a singing practice room business shall complete registration with the head of a Si/Gun/Gu equipped with facilities for singing practice room business;

Nevertheless, at around 23:50 on April 8, 2019, the Defendant installed five rooms and one room, and received 30,000 won per hour from many and unspecified persons. On April 26, 2019, the Defendant run a singing practice room business without obtaining 35,000 won per hour against E by installing a video-competing device, etc. in the said “D singing practice room” and installing a video-competing device, etc. in the said “D singing practice room” and receiving 35,000 won per hour against E.

(b) No karaoke machine business operator shall sell or provide any alcoholic beverage;

Nevertheless, around April 8, 2019, the Defendant received 4,000 won per disease to male customers in the name of the said “D Kinginging practice room” and sold 10 bottles to male customers.

C. On April 8, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 23:50 on April 23, 2019, sent to B, etc. KRW 35,00 per hour from “D Kinging practice room”; and (b) assisted the Defendant to provide entertainment by bringing to the eight room where male descendants in his/her name were seated; and (c) making the Defendant drink and talk with his/her singing together with his/her customers.

2. On April 8, 2019, Defendant B: (a) around 23:50, the Defendant received KRW 35,000 per hour from A in the “D King practice room”; and (b) provided entertainment with his/her nameless male customers, such as drinking alcohol, singing, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of each statute on the suspect examination of police officers to F, G, H, I, J, K, and E;

1. Article 34 (2) and Article 22 (1) 4 of the Music Industry Promotion Act (the point of good offices for a loan), and Article 22 (1) 4 of the Act on Promotion of Music Industry;