logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.05.29 2015고정299
음악산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates music record and music video production business under the trade name of “B.”

around 22:00 on October 26, 2014, the Defendant was operating a music record and music video production business under the name of “B” in the name of “B” in the broad name city of Gyeonggi-do, but, in fact, he was equipped with the facilities, such as video or non-video conference room, so that he can sing out to the meeting of the class without a musical performer and received entrance fees or facility usage fees. Around October 22, 2014, the Defendant operated a singing practice room business.

Any person who intends to run a singing practice room business shall have facilities for singing practice room business and shall register with the head of the competent Si/Gun/Gu.

Nevertheless, from around October 22, 2012 to around October 22, 2014, the Defendant run a non-registered singing practice room business, such as setting up a video-competing device, etc. to allow singing in the above B without registration, and recording or singing of sound at the request of an unspecified number of customers, by photographing it with screen pictures, providing customers with the income of KRW 30,000 per hour.

(b) No person who runs a singing practice room business shall sell or provide alcoholic beverages within his/her business establishment;

Nevertheless, around 22:00 on October 6, 2014, the Defendant, who was found to be a customer, violated the rules of practice of a karaoke machine business operator by selling ten cans (20,000 won) to eight customers who were found to be a customer, and selling ten cans (20,000 won).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site photograph Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant reported his/her music-video production work, and claimed that the Defendant’s act does not constitute a crime since he/she conducted a music-video production business, registered as a retail store and sold alcoholic beverages.

In this regard, the defendant's business contents and the production of music records and music video products, which can be known by the evidence mentioned above.

arrow