1. The punishment of the accused shall be one year;

2. Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 201, the Defendant, a representative of the Do National Tax Service, registered with the Do National Tax Service, has been the Defendant. At the time of June 2016, the Defendant: (a) was an opportunity to work as the Chairperson of the Committee for Countermeasures against Damage Compensation (an organization to receive compensation for damage arising from infringement of fishery rights arising from the construction of a bridge on the neighboring sea of the E Ri); and (b) made a false statement to F, a representative of the Eri C, stating, “A request to prepare documents related to the Countermeasure Committee, so he/she has to write the documents related to the Countermeasure Committee,” and (c) took the stamp, using his/her seal and his/her identification card, forged the request for deposit in the name of Eri C and received the deposit for personal use.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On June 28, 2016, the Defendant related to G account entered “G”, “total termination”, and “E Ri C” in the name column in the written request for a deposit located at the gold-do gold-do gold-gun, J. Synam-gun, J. Synam-do, which had been located there, into the bank account column by means of a pen in the form of a written request for a deposit located at the gold-do gold-gun, G account-related gold-gun, which had been held by F by the said method next to the name.

E The E seal has been stamped.

B. The Defendant related to the H account entered “H”, “wholly terminated”, and “Ei C” in the name column in the account number column using the pen in the written request form for deposits kept at the above date, time, and place, and marked the said E seal.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant committed two clauses on the deposit claim in the name of Eri C, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, exercised the aforementioned investigation document as if it were a document duly formed with the written request for a forged deposit to I, an employee of the Suhyup, who was aware of the forgery.

3. The Defendant’s fraud is the date, time, and place indicated in paragraph 1 as above.