1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff graduated from C at B University in around 1977, and was appointed as a full-time lecturer at the above university on May 10, 1986 after acquiring a master’s degree in around 1979 at the above university, and on May 10, 1986, as D and professor until April 1, 2006.

B. On April 1, 2006, the defendant made professional terms to the plaintiff on April 1, 2006, including the following grounds for disciplinary action Nos. 1 and 2.

(d) and (e);

In the judgment of paragraph, it is necessary to explain in detail through each share.

(2) Of the grounds for disciplinary action, Article 51(1) of the Public Educational Officials Act and Article 78(1)1 through 3 of the State Public Officials Act (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”) were deemed to be “the instant disciplinary action,” and among them, removal from office was made pursuant to Article 51(1) of the Public Educational Officials Act and Article 78(1)1 through 3 of the State Public Officials Act.

The plaintiff is conducting research on the establishment, etc. of a stem cell line by the nuclear transplantation of a human somatic cell. ① Even if a stem cell line acquired as a result of an experiment on or around December 2003 is not a stem cell line established by the donor’s somatic-cell nuclear transplantation on or around the thesis, the plaintiff is a thesis "K" published in J on March 12, 2004 (Wvol. 169 through 1674 from among Wvol. 303).

The term "the thesis of 2004" is referred to as "the thesis".

(B) As a result of the gene (DNA) analysis operated by stem cell lines in E hospital and the revised e hospital describe both the stem cell line acquisition using data as data, the false academic thesis was published as the first author and joint cocomer, and obtained domestic and foreign reputation, such as the establishment of stem cell lines published in the above paper as well as the receipt of the Order of G Merit from the F President based on the research business results related thereto. ② On March 17, 2005, while there were only two stem cell lines presumed to be a customized stem cell line as a result of the experiment, it was published in J on June 17, 2005.