1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Around 1977, the Plaintiff graduated from B University C and was appointed as a full-time lecturer at the same university on May 10, 1986 after obtaining a doctor’s degree from the same university around 1979, and as a professor until April 1, 2006.

The plaintiff is conducting research on the establishment, etc. of a stem cell line by the nuclear transplantation of a human somatic cell. ① Even if a stem cell line acquired as a result of an experiment on or around December 2003 is not a stem cell line established by the donor’s somatic-cell nuclear transplantation on or around the thesis, the plaintiff is a thesis "K" published in J on March 12, 2004 (Wvol, No. 1669 through 1674 from among Wvol, 303).

The term "the paper" refers to "the 2004 paper". (No. 6) The results of the analysis of the gene (DNA) operated by the stem cell line in (No. 6) and the revised term of E hospital describe that the stem cell line acquired the stem cell line by using data the stem cell line theme photographs as data, and makes a false academic thesis as the first author and the joint co-rhetor, and received a false academic thesis as a result of the establishment of the stem cell line published in the above paper and the related research work, and received the Order of G from the F President.

(B) The purpose of this paper is to make false a 11 somatic cell reproduction cell line, which has been completed by using two stem cell lines of the revised stem cell line, by using the 11st stem cell line, and to fill out the immunodeficiency photographs (forest 1), DNA fingerprint analysis data (forest 2), themetoma analysis (forest 3), the photograph of the embryo formation experiment (forest 3), and to avoid ethical problems related to the acquisition of ovum for experiment.