Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A was required to prepare a sales contract stating that Defendant B entered into a contract with Defendant B with KRW 1150 million. On December 28, 2011, Defendant A, at the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Construction Work Office, he/she entered into a contract with Defendant B to present the contract. On December 28, 2011, the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Construction Work Office entered the name column into the “F University Construction Works related to the heating and boiler removal pipe in the form of a sales contract,” “F University” in the field address column, “F University” in the field address column, “F University’s KRW 15,000 (15,000)” in the seller column, “D” in the seller column, “In the address column,” and “H and the business number column” in the business number column, “I” was inserted next to the name.

As a result, the Defendants forged a sales contract in the name of the I, a private document concerning rights and duties for the purpose of uttering in collusion.

2. On December 30, 201, Defendant A entered into a contract for the transfer of boiler construction with the E in a multi-purpose where the whereabouts of Chungcheongnam-do, Young-do, Young-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and presented a forged sales contract to E, who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to use a forged sales contract.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of a copy of a sales contract and a copy of a scrap metal sales contract to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 231, 234, and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Facts charged and the Defendants’ assertion

A. Around December 2011, Defendant A, with the knowledge of the fact that the representative I of (State) D was the owner of the F University’s water storage machine and boiler-related pipeline removal work (successful bidder KRW 68,88 million), proposed the above acceptance to Defendant B.

Defendant

B The difference shall be acquired by resale of the above removal construction right.