beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 19:00 on February 21, 201, the Defendant entered into a sales contract with the victim C for approximately 40 percent of pine trees in Hanwon Hongcheon-gun D and Hongcheon-gun E, and the Defendant agreed to enter into a contract with the victim for KRW 136 million in Samsung Ireland, and the other one is to enter into a contract with the motherland for KRW 450 million. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 60 million in the purchase cost of the tree, the amount of KRW 3-40 million in the purchase and sale of the tree remains, and the principal amount of KRW 60 million in the purchase and sale of the tree plus KRW 70 million in the principal amount of KRW 60 million in the total amount of KRW 30 million in the total amount of KRW 30 million in the total amount of KRW 1.3 million in the total amount of the loan.
However, in fact, the defendant did not have concluded the above contract with Samsung Heavyland and Modago, and even if he received the money from the victim, he did not have any intent or ability to repay the money received from the victim in lieu of the victim by selling the money.
Around February 28, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 56 million from the victim’s account under A’s name.
2. On March 4, 2011, the Defendant forged private document: (a) stated “D40 weeks” in the applicable lot number column in the land sale contract for pine trees in the Hongcheon-gun Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun; (b) “Y million won” in the total contract amount column; (c) “Y on March 4, 201 in the contract date column”; and (d) indicated “H” in the Hongcheon-gun G and the name (trade name) column; and affixed “I”’s fingerprint on the business number column; and (d) sealed H’s fingerprint on the name side.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a contract for tree sales in the name of H, which is a private document on rights and obligations.
3. On March 201, 201, the Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document issued a forged contract for the sales of pine trees as if it were a document duly formed, to J, who is unaware of the forgery at a Cheongju-si (hereinafter referred to as “Cheongju-si”) and then delivered it as if it were a document.