A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 23, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to three years in Seoul Northern District Court for the charge of forging private documents, the crime of uttering of a falsified document, and the crime of fraud. The judgment became final and conclusive on June 3, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant: (a) requested C(State) representative director D to provide C’s trademark disturbance with “E” trademark disturbance; (b) sought a statement that D wishes to engage in a transaction with the company that is able to believe, and (c) had the intention to forge a sales contract in the name of F(State).

At around 15:30 on February 28, 2009, the Defendant, without authority, affixed a name tag of F (F) representative director H and the fourth floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul International Building, under the column of “F (F)” as indicated in the column of “B” for the purpose of exercising the F (State) office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with a seal affixed to the name tag of F (State). After the above H’s name, the Defendant prepared one copy of the sales contract with the seal affixed to F (State) corporation, and signed one copy of the acquisition certificate of the content that the Defendant acquired the C (State) product under the above sales contract with the seal affixed to F (State) representative director as indicated in the column of “H,” and written one copy with the seal affixed to F (State) corporation’s name and rear.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a sales contract with respect to the rights and obligations under the name of the F (State) representative director H, or a certificate of fact, and a certificate of acceptance respectively.

2. On February 28, 2009, the Defendant: (a) around the street in front of the above F (State); (b) delivered the forged sales contract form, one copy of the receipt form, and one copy of the receipt form, as if they were duly formed, to D, who is aware of such forgery.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, presented a forged sales contract and receipt to the victim D as above, and made a false statement as if F (State) would normally receive the above “E” column from C (State).

However, this paper examined above.